you're reading...

West to rake in billions from Libyan war

People who think that the West’s intervention in Libya is just another oil grab are mistaken. Broadly speaking, for Britain military intervention is mainly about arms, Italy its natural gas, France its water and for the US its counter-terrorism and reconstruction contracts. Spreading democracy and saving the people of Benghazi form merely tangential benefits used to justify these ends.

Lest we forget, NATO’s bombardment began because Mr. Gathafi threatened to do to Benghazi what Mr. Bashar al-Assad’s forces are doing to various Syrian cities and NATO itself is poised to do in Sirte.

”History is a set of lies agreed upon” once remarked Napoleon Bonaparte. If left unchallenged the true motives behind what the French mainstream media have coined ”Sarkozy’s War” may be lost in the fog of war.

So what makes Libya so important to the West? Any real estate agent could tell you: location, location, location. Given that Libya sits atop the strategic intersection of the Mediterranean, African, and Arab worlds, control of the nation, has always been a remarkably effective way to project power into these three regions and beyond.

Ever since time immemorial Western control over Libya has been of great importance. After Libyan independence in 1951, US, British and French payments for military basing rights formed the single-largest element of Libyan GDP until oil exports began to flow in 1961.

Nowadays, Mr. Sarkozy’s interest in Libya lies in a commodity more precious than oil, namely water. It is becoming increasingly accepted that water promises to be to the 21st century what oil was to the 20th century: the precious commodity that determines the wealth of nations.

Unlike oil, there are no substitutes, alternatives or stopgaps for water. Nature has decreed that the supply of water is fixed. Meanwhile demand rises inexorably as the world’s population increases and enriches itself. Population growth, climate change, pollution, urbanization and the rapid development of manufacturing industries are relentlessly combining such that demand for fresh water will outstrip supply by 40% by 2040.

Libya sits on a resource more valuable than oil, the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer, which is an immensely vast underground sea of fresh water. Colonel Gathafi had cleverly invested $25 billion in the Great Man-made River Project, a complex 4,000 Km long water pipeline buried beneath the desert that could transport two million cubic metres of water a day. Such a monumental water distribution scheme could turn Libya – a nation that is 95% desert – into a food self-sufficient arable oasis.

Today France’s global mega-water companies like Suez, Ondeo and Saur, control more than 45% of the world’s water market and are rushing to privatize water, already a $400 billion global business. For these French companies, Libya will be a bonanza. No wonder Le Mondé coined it ”Sarkozy’s War” and had a ”Victoire” front page splash when Mr. Gathafi’s compound was stormed.

Late last year the Central Intelligence Agency suspiciously raised the spectre of ”future ‘hydrological warfare’ in which rivers, lakes and aquifers become national security assets to be fought over,” or controlled through proxy armies and client states. Regime change in Libya, is the first major instance of hydrological warfare.

With the spoils of war from Libya’s water market largely reserved for the French, Mr. Cameron is eyeing another market, that of arms.

The subject of the West selling arms to regimes suppressing uprisings remains as willfully overlooked as an American war crime. Even as The Times of London has just reported that Britain enjoyed a 30% spike in arms sales to regimes in the Middle East during the Arab Spring. Arms sold between February and July jumped to 101 million dollars, the Times’ report says, noting that these include weapons that could be used to suppress domestic protests.

Mr. Obama’s administration is even more steeped in the controversial arms trade. The US accepts no rival on this front. Over the past decade the US has averaged a staggering $5.8 billion per year in arms sales with the Middle East.

The very Libyan military hardware that NATO boastfully claims to have downgraded by 90% will need to be rebuilt. US arms companies will gleefully be on hand to arm their proxy regime to the teeth. Libya will be a bonanza for American arms dealers.

American infrastructure contractors will also reap the windfalls of post-war reconstruction. The grim reality is that every bridge, road, rail-link and building that US war-planes bomb will have to be rebuilt and payed for by the Libyan taxpayer.

Even grimmer still is the fact that the approximately $1.1billion spent by the US government on bombarding Libya is a drop in the ocean compared to the profit that American contractors stand to make. Many of whom have strong ties to the upper echelons of the military and the Obama administration.

In-fact, more than 70 American companies and individuals have won up to $8 billion in contracts for work in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan over the last two years, according to a new study by the Center for Public Integrity.

According to the study, nearly 70 percent of these companies had employees or board members who either served in or had close ties to the executive branch for Republican and Democratic administrations, for members of Congress of both parties, or at the highest levels of the military.

Therefore, those in the military tasked with minimising ‘collateral damage’ to property stand to directly profit from less than pin point precision. In short, dropping bombs can be profitable.

The recent bombshell revelations of correspondence between the CIA and Libya’s security apparatus prove that the US has been outsourcing its torture or ”enhanced interrogation” of terror suspects to Libya through the internationally illegal rendition process. These revelations are embarrassing but hardly surprising. Nevertheless, there is little doubt a pliant proxy regime will continue to do America’s dirty work.

Last but not least there is oil. Much as the self-righteous West might pretend otherwise, oil is unquestionably a key part of the equation. Libya has the largest oil reserves in Africa and 85% of its exports are to Europe.

Archival footage of Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi surrounded by Mr. Gathafi’s female bodyguards, kissing the Libyan strongman’s hand at Leonardo Da Vinci airport is indicative of just how important Libya is to Italy.

Libya’s oil is especially important to Italy because of its proximity, the ease of its extraction, and the sweetness of its crude. Most refineries in Italy and elsewhere are built to deal with sweet Libyan crude, they cannot easily process the heavier Saudi crude that has recently replaced the Libyan production shortfall.

Libyan natural gas reserves are estimated to be over 52.7 trillion cubic feet and large areas of the country are still to be surveyed. With assured supplies available from Libya, Italy will become less dependent on supplies from Russia, which on the energy front, is increasingly flexing its muscles and thumbing its nose at mainland Europe.

Libya has a 1,800km coastline just miles from Italy and porous southern borders with three poor African nations. Therefore, a pliant regime that will stem the flow of asylum seekers and keep the oil and gas flowing is vital for Rome.

From oil to water, water-boarding to arms and from gas to reconstruction the war in Libya will rake in billions of dollars for the West. Just how much will trickle down to the people of Libya remains to be seen.

by Gari Chengu



4 thoughts on “West to rake in billions from Libyan war

  1. Reinhold Niebuhr once said that human beings are endowed with both selfish and unselfish impulses and many times one might have unselfish intentions but they are usually laced with selfish ones as well. I believe that the same is true of nations, and that’s why we should not be suprised by the actions you mentioned in your article. I am of the view however, that our ire should be directed towards leaders who like Ghadafi create conditions which are conducive for such scrambles. I am sure you recognise and sympathise with those who were opposed to Ghadafi’s 42 year old reign, some of whom were mercilessly tortured for their opposition?

    Posted by Bernard | September 6, 2011, 2:14 pm
    • Why would your so-called “ire” be directed towards Ghadafi …… unless one is Libyan?
      If you are weak for “ire” every time a nation of people have conflicts among themselves, then when would be the time for you to live without “ire”?
      Truth is; you are most likely filled with “ire”, and is merely using the Libyan situation to justify living with the self-destructive “ire”.

      For even if Ghadafi was alleged to be criminal towards his fellow countrymen in Libya, then bringing him to real justice would be the responsibility of Libyans; because they are the ones who allowed Ghadaffi, ONE OF THEIR OWN, to be their leader in the first place!

      The violence-loving, criminal and warmongering europeans ARE NEVER EVER about justice, compassion or the like; because those are human qualities; and justice & compassion ARE NOT in the nature of those who are historically of a beastly disposition.

      As is the case in Iraq & elsewhere, the rampaging & beastly barbarians of europe can only make things worse than they otherwise would have been if Libyans were allowed to solve their own problems, which they will still have to do while fending off the divisive european thieves who will now be sowing even more divisions among Libyans in order to enable their plunder of African resources.
      And more 911s will naturally follow; because the Semites do thrive on vengeance. lol

      Posted by Jukwa | September 6, 2011, 5:15 pm
  2. ”’History is a set of lies agreed upon,” once remarked Napoleon Bonaparte.’????

    We have to take care to put in proper context the words of the Europeans, who have never been known for their wisdom!

    And so, ‘history is a set of lies agreed upon’ is true ONLY WITH THE WORTHLESS WORDS OF EUROPEANS, who are known and historical liars!

    It is very very important to not interpret the present and TEMPORARY domination of european devilishness across the planet, as an element of wisdom that is directing human life towards greater & sustainable good, and which is not to be neutralized & eventually destroyed.
    Truth is; european devilish across the planet needs urgently to be reversed and eventually destroyed for the good of humanity.

    For all those Africans states who are wittingly or unwitting supporting the divisiveness, devilishness & destructiveness of the evil europeans in Libya & elsewhere, those Africans SHOULD KNOW that they have been engaged in self-destructive activities!

    After all these years of being Africans worse enemy, it is disheartening to see that some Africans still can’t see, or refuse to see, the big African ‘elephant in the room’. That elephant is: The pale devils of europe are Africans’ mortal enemies, so are the arabs incidentally.

    And these relentless euro & arab enemies seek only domination, plunder & eventual DISPLACEMENT of Africans in their Ancestral lands.

    Posted by Jukwa | September 6, 2011, 4:55 pm
  3. So who was worse? They have found Ghadafi took over 200bn from his people. Again you back the wrong horse!

    Posted by garikaichengu | November 8, 2011, 7:47 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


Garikai Chengu on twitter

email me on garikai.chengu@gmail.com

%d bloggers like this: